Kunming terrorist attack Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Kunming terrorist attack - Assignment Example On Sunday 2nd March 2014, police rounded up members of the Uighur population in the city for questioning, a move that was not taken well by the members of the Uighur community as they claim there is no way they could have identified the individuals since they were in black. Most of the attacks of this nature usually happen in Xinjiang where there there are common clashes between members of Uighur community and the police, therefore this was a special case since it took place more than 1, 500 kilometres away from the region. The UN security council condemned the attack and said there was no justification for any acts of terrorism and those responsible for the act should be brought to justice. The attack comes near the opening of the annual legislature where the government would delivers its report on its one year performance, therefore the incident was likely to dent the report. In another report, United States has finally called the attack a terrorist attack after accusations from the Chinese government on the failure to call the attack ‘ an act of terrorism’ which was carried out by eight attackers and left more than 130 people injured. The united states embassy in China had initially referred to the attack as ‘horrific, senseless act of violence’ which was seen as not strong enough by Chinese authorities. Xinjiang, which is the region largely inhabited by Uighur people who are Muslim minority, has been increasingly experiencing unrest due to immigration by the Han majority to the region, for instance, in 2009, ethnic violence in the region left more than 200 people dead. For a long time, the government has blamed Uighur activists for the violence while on the other hand the Uighur activists blame the government’s excessive control for the violence in the

Business law questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Business law questions - Essay Example The first of these is the belief that the current trajectory of the economy and governmental spending models is unsustainable and will result in a crash of epic proportions once the currency loses its strength and/or a loss of faith within the monetary system is evidenced around the world. However, a secondary and more nuanced approach is that debt and budget deficits in and of themselves are not necessarily a bad thing; rather such an approach seeks to prove that as long as the economy is growing at a commensurately faster rate than is the national debt and budget deficits, then all is well. As a function of analyzing these two approaches and drawing a level of inference from them, this brief analysis will succinctly define both of these approaches and enumerate upon the strengths and weaknesses that both portend. Firstly, with regards to the pessimists approach that the current levels of debt and budget deficits are untenable, one can look to the contrary example of Japan and many other highly developed and wealthy nations around the world to give first hand evidence of the fact that high levels of sustained debt and budget deficits are not necessarily proof that the end of the economic system is soon to be realized. However, just because there are other nations in the world that sustain high levels of debt and continue to experience large yearly budget deficits should not be understood to mean that these factors do not have any effect at all on the overall economic strength of the system. Secondly, the alternative view supports the fact that debt and budget deficits are not necessarily a bad thing; especially considering the extant need that is exhibited within the current economy. Individuals that espouse this approach, such as Paul Krugman, believe that the government and the society at large exhibits a need that must be fulfilled during such difficult